Simulation lets teams pre-train policies safely at scale before real-world deployment. But sim-to-real transfer fails when simulation runs are not paired with real-world validation — the gap between sim behavior and physical behavior kills policies that look good in training.
Use cases we support:
Why teams partner with us:
Sim alone isn’t enough — the gap kills policies.
We pair every sim dataset with real-world validation trajectories. Our 91% transfer rate comes from this pairing discipline, not from simulation quality alone.
10K+ sims per day
91% sim-to-real transfer rate
paired real + sim datasets
Where we collect
41+ delivery centers across 12 countries. Every program runs from a Roborax hub near your target time zone.
Asia Pacific
India · Philippines
Americas
USA · Canada · Colombia · Jamaica · El Salvador · Belize
EMEA
UK · Albania · Kosovo · Morocco
NVIDIA Isaac, DeepMind MuJoCo, Genesis, Habitat Lab, plus custom Blender pipelines.
NVIDIA
DeepMind
Custom physics
Meta
Asset creation
Your engine
Four output classes designed to close the sim-to-real gap, not just produce synthetic frames.
Domain randomization across textures, lighting, physics, and object placement.
Identical scenes captured in both sim and reality for direct gap measurement.
Controlled-variable runs for ablations and curriculum design.
Synthetic generated to match your real-world statistics.
A pipeline that ends with sim-to-real metrics, not just rendered images.
Build the parameterized scene with your team. Variables and ranges locked.
Sweeps across textures, lighting, physics, and asset variants.
Quality gates filter failed sims. Per-batch realism metrics computed.
Transfer rate measured against held-out real captures. Reported per batch.
Six hardware families. One data partner.
Whole-body trajectories for bipedal robots.
Long-horizon tasks on mobile platforms.
High-throughput arm data for factory settings.
Domain-randomized scenes and sim transfers.
Held-out test sets and success-rate scoring.
Rare scenarios your policy faces in production.
FAQ
Tell us the engine and the transfer gap. We come back with a templated scene plan and target metrics.
FROM THE FIELD
Warehouse robot training data programs consistently underperform their lab benchmarks in production. The reason is almost never the model architecture. It is almost always a
Surgical robot training data has requirements that no general-purpose robotics data program is built to meet out of the box. Sub-millimeter precision, HIPAA compliance, and
A robotics data quality assurance pipeline is not a checklist or a review meeting. At production scale, robotics data quality requires automated validation, per-operator metrics,
Robot data annotation is not image labeling with a different name. The temporal structure of robot trajectories, the grounding in physical task semantics, and the
Sim-to-real robot training with synthetic data is one of the most powerful techniques in embodied AI — and one of the most misunderstood. The gap
The embodied AI training data problem is structurally different from the language model data problem. Language models learned from the internet. Embodied AI must learn
